From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10946: 24.0.94; eval-after-load incompatible change Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 21:40:39 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1331347295 24118 80.91.229.3 (10 Mar 2012 02:41:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 02:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Leo , 10946@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 10 03:41:33 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S6CFQ-00061S-JT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:41:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54887 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6CFP-0005mZ-D8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 21:41:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40214) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6CFM-0005mF-4b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 21:41:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6CFK-0003VJ-HM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 21:41:27 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34676) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6CFK-0003VF-CY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 21:41:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S6Chy-0001ke-Jt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:11:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10946 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10946-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10946.13313490216681 (code B ref 10946); Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10946) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2012 03:10:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41508 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S6ChI-0001ji-Fo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:10:20 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:28358) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S6ChF-0001jZ-4F for 10946@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:10:18 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AicFAKU/KE9soXdS/2dsb2JhbACBX5x7eYhwnhmGGQSGUJRJhAs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,1,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="167094036" Original-Received: from 108-161-119-82.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([108.161.119.82]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 09 Mar 2012 21:40:39 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8C2ECAE268; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 21:40:39 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:14:54 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:57616 Archived-At: > So IMO there should at least be a NEWS entry about this. Indeed, please add one. > Isn't it possible to get the old behaviour back by changing the thing > that gets added to after-load-alist from: > (when load-file-name > ...stuff...) > to > (if load-file-name > ...stuff... > ;; Not being provided from a file, run form right now. > (form)) Yes, please do make this change, maybe with a warning about it being discouraged. Stefan