From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: trunk r116456: Improve dbus performance on synchronous calls Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:00:56 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87lhx9lo4y.fsf@gmx.de> <53023627.1060001@dancol.org> <874n3xmor1.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392681671 14690 80.91.229.3 (18 Feb 2014 00:01:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dancol@dancol.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 18 01:01:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WFY7i-0002Um-Qv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 01:01:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45013 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFY7i-0003ua-Ff for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:01:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46122) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFY7U-0003dF-RI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:01:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFY7N-0002iW-HV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:01:04 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:4224) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFY7N-0002iS-E4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:00:57 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFLd/lO/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFLd/lO/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="47907850" Original-Received: from 75-119-249-78.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.249.78]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 17 Feb 2014 19:00:56 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 9C442610E9; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:00:56 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <874n3xmor1.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:08:02 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169726 Archived-At: > Maybe `sit-for' is wrong then as well? No, the `push' is right: if unread-command-events is non-nil at that point, it means it holds events which `read-event' did not read yet (and hence come *after* the event we just received). Stefan