From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17467: 24.3; locate-library returning spurious path Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 02:39:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1399876834 28642 80.91.229.3 (12 May 2014 06:40:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 06:40:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17467 <17467@debbugs.gnu.org> To: Alex Kosorukoff Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 12 08:40:26 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WjjuT-0001AD-I0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 08:40:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35583 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WjjuS-0000hi-HS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 02:40:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51617) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WjjuG-0000bL-MJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 02:40:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wjju7-0006BR-O6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 02:40:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42742) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wjju7-0006AS-Lm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 02:40:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wjju6-0005H8-Jx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 02:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 06:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17467 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17467-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17467.139987675420188 (code B ref 17467); Mon, 12 May 2014 06:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17467) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2014 06:39:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60092 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WjjtJ-0005FX-S4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 02:39:14 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:36107) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WjjtG-0005F1-1Q for 17467@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 02:39:10 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s4C6d4vV019749; Mon, 12 May 2014 02:39:05 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3D8A1600EC; Mon, 12 May 2014 02:39:04 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Alex Kosorukoff's message of "Sun, 11 May 2014 21:36:22 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4939=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9378 : core <4939> : inlines <853> : streams <1180231> : uri <1754527> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:88956 Archived-At: > variant matched tramp.el.old which is not a valid library name. Who cares? The point is that if the user asks to load foo.el.old, we should consider load-file-rep-suffixes, whereas for "foo" we shouldn't. I'm not particularly worried about finding files with name "foo.el.old.el". > + (unless nosuffix > + (if (string-match "\\.elc?\\(\\.gz\\)?\\'" library) I don't want to hardcode "gz" here. We have load-file-rep-suffixes for that. > + (if (= 2 (length (match-data))) load-file-rep-suffixes) > + (get-load-suffixes)))))) If you only use (get-load-suffixes) that will fail when we (load "~/.gnus"). My check for absolute-file-name-p was not an optimization. Stefan