From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD? Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 10:28:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87lhhjuq26.fsf@gmail.com> <5538C48F.2020005@cs.ucla.edu> <87fv7rupcc.fsf@gmail.com> <5538C6C0.2000609@cs.ucla.edu> <83sibr15ac.fsf@gnu.org> <878udjun89.fsf@gmail.com> <83pp6v14cy.fsf@gnu.org> <87sibr84hb.fsf@gmail.com> <83oamf12ax.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv7rqcc7.fsf@gmail.com> <83lhhj10mb.fsf@gnu.org> <877ft0fpax.fsf@gmail.com> <83oamcxx99.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429972126 22624 80.91.229.3 (25 Apr 2015 14:28:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 14:28:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, Oleh Krehel , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 25 16:28:31 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ym14I-000186-NU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 16:28:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48512 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ym14H-0002y0-Mu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 10:28:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52908) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ym146-0002xr-3x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 10:28:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ym142-0006QX-8t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 10:28:17 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:59895) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ym142-0006QO-4Z; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 10:28:14 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t3PES33n007843; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 10:28:03 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0B811250C; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 10:28:03 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83oamcxx99.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 25 Apr 2015 14:28:34 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5287=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5287> : inlines <2795> : streams <1428389> : uri <1915539> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:185870 Archived-At: > I'd like to know as well. So far no one objected to leaving the > trailing underscores for the sake of the concurrency branch. So > unless someone does come up with objections soon, I'd interpret that > as meaning that BVAR and KVAR should still append the underscore, and > the fields marked INTERNAL till today should have that underscore. I'm not opposed to removing INTERNAL_FIELD and wouldn't oppose removing the underscore either. But if Eli wants to keep either of them that's fine by me as well. The only problem I have with this is the fact that we're just going back&forth on this. Stefan