From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 255a011: Add `save-mark-and-excursion', which has the old `save-excursion' behavior Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 13:50:11 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20150504184829.1108.13525@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87twvskku2.fsf@petton.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1430848276 18705 80.91.229.3 (5 May 2015 17:51:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 17:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Daniel Colascione , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Nicolas Petton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 05 19:51:05 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ypgzp-0005N4-07 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 19:51:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41052 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ypgzo-000569-F3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 13:51:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45595) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpgzP-0004pz-F1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 13:50:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpgzO-00057d-Ps for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 13:50:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]:51029) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpgzO-00057Z-MM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 13:50:38 -0400 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6806385F64; Tue, 5 May 2015 13:50:37 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AE41E5B96; Tue, 5 May 2015 13:50:11 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A922CB41A0; Tue, 5 May 2015 13:50:11 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87twvskku2.fsf@petton.fr> (Nicolas Petton's message of "Tue, 05 May 2015 01:02:29 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, MC_TSTLAST 0.00) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 132.204.24.67 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186254 Archived-At: >>> + (setf nmark (marker-position saved-mark)) >> ^^^^ >> Old habits die hard. > Should `setf' be avoided? Is it only when `setq' would do instead? Sorry, I guess `setf' work as well, here. I've just been bitten by bootstrapping problems too many times, but simple.el should be late enough that it can't be a problem. Stefan