From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: User-defined record types, v2 Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:51:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86y3w2tt2n.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <86k27lsgr3.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1489928162 32181 195.159.176.226 (19 Mar 2017 12:56:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 12:56:02 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 19 13:55:56 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cpaN9-00079M-OU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 13:55:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56779 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpaNF-0004Lo-Pk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:55:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpaMk-0004LY-2v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:55:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpaMg-00060S-7Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:55:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=39496 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpaMg-0005zK-1L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:55:18 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cpaMT-0003B2-1K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 13:55:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 8 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:5VyJR1j03FsaBJiKF97t3wrJFpI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213151 Archived-At: > I think the wording of the `equal' docstring and manual makes it ok to > compare records element-wise. That's also backward compatible. Yes, that's good, thanks. Stefan