From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixing package-initialize, adding early init file Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 20:11:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83po9vos4z.fsf@gnu.org> <87shelv2m6.fsf@udel.edu> <83vajgh4xe.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1508976722 28343 195.159.176.226 (26 Oct 2017 00:12:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:12:02 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 26 02:11:58 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e7Vm9-0006wX-Rd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 02:11:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50397 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7VmH-0001Fg-8T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 20:12:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39837) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7Vlf-0001Fb-MO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 20:11:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7Vlc-0000ha-Gs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 20:11:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=48710 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7Vlc-0000gF-9F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 20:11:24 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e7VlE-0000Xr-7C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 02:11:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:qqKC7WIb/zaixj3LPsPnL4vhfY8= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219771 Archived-At: >> - do we want to try to factor out some common logic in loading the >> early init file versus the regular init file? I think so, yes. >> - have I broken anything in moving the check for an invalid username >> earlier in startup.el? what about moving package-initialize earlier? Time will tell. >> - should `early-init-file' be defined in C? If it's not indispensable, then I'd say no. >> Additional question: if we moved forward with this patch, would it >> make it into Emacs 26.1? No, it's too late for that. Stefan