From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Smarter M-x that filters on major-mode Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 18:21:03 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8ed9b43502ae1480e06b@heytings.org> <83r1lohqoc.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnvfenry.fsf@gnus.org> <87blcrdlqf.fsf@gnus.org> <87im6ywhyp.fsf@gnus.org> <871rdmwbpo.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28518"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 12 00:22:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lALHq-0007K5-VP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:22:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41988 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lALHq-0003lX-21 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 18:22:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46350) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lALGv-0003Fv-Fw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 18:21:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:43812) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lALGl-0006JY-6C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 18:21:16 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A0F0F809DC; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 18:21:05 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 564448037A; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 18:21:04 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1613085664; bh=uYhwp5r1VQjEULe5kEKEh0rlkix8MM9plSZFDSiA8Gc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=kDBpKjCjTyye9iQ1TJ5u+yzYskcSoA1LFVDCPHk7VrPVYnHNXLO8rk5ryk/0HpGT3 sM6NEb40GkvJIq7ZFSlWbUy2KOVAJw+gE0b6uJbxhSZcpJ5Wk5J8Pp1+LCT9+lvbva cD+atdEbuNNUE4x+FPpiGwDW/wS3vSSAGl9TkJigikaYRffH8HkzelvRo8kRwZJbjo AE7bMA4UGl69UrAEC5iEbh64Jz8r1eu0yE2Msd/CPL/QYjnXz87vnIgfP6Npk6GCGB EGTZKpKnzRdzQVrHjPa2okuE115D7anvCEa77QLwDVL1dpEfX7CXlXOrztcj2ch1vZ D2WE/wgPDu4HA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.41.47]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FEDC1202D7; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 18:21:04 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <871rdmwbpo.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 11 Feb 2021 22:12:19 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264451 Archived-At: > Would it make sense to introduce a keyword to `define-derived-mode' that > would allow saying :interactive nil? I don't see any benefit in making it not interactive. But I do see a benefit in not listing it in `M-x` completion. Stefan