From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: not quite understanding input methods Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:00:18 -0400 Message-ID: References: <231adc63-77f0-037a-365c-28db98f684cf@piermont.com> <7343dfd2-05d5-0752-8e43-cd44d6394963@piermont.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7840"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Perry E. Metzger" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 30 20:01:52 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mKlbT-0001qd-0n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 20:01:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45078 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mKlbS-000084-0i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:01:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36716) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mKla7-0006VU-0I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:00:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:37049) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mKla3-0001eT-0u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:00:25 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D98AE440A97; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:00:20 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AC6E5440CE3; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:00:19 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1630346419; bh=pejgENfghesMkvvPK5kWJGhadQU/ciAtlEcj7JbfGWU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=LCY8p0UCrxD/VUOsBrq/gwHhhrJ5mVho1zonQXn7mpMNxbJ4BClOcjvcEB5syW1kj 71A450U2MC3hHjLna6y7FOGOwUmm14rKEYFZkljHA+7ksiAq7oTUEJC/zm6oC7HjIF KznMpTZZIxXEfH2l8sULRcG6ZCabNUtd/KZjkn8D3pTG0igXIMiLhzsyJimQ/eahaX x4XVaTGRYy81V1O7lri2zCIplxJ+pOL/O8FC492pTWaRVHqUXwOP4ntOrxV/NKU8ZV uspkrOteK7XCuzAybbWT5WurGbYXB6ySsXZ/hUgIeaaRu0McFmg/cDqhXl3WgbAjG7 B98ALOFvReByA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.244.135]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 656AA120351; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:00:19 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <7343dfd2-05d5-0752-8e43-cd44d6394963@piermont.com> (Perry E. Metzger's message of "Mon, 30 Aug 2021 13:45:05 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273523 Archived-At: >> This is a hard-coded limit in the C code side of input-methods, as seen >> in src/keyboard.c (line 3117): > Seems to be at 3065 in master. Looks like I wasn't on the right branch, sorry. > This sounds like a reasonable idea. If such a variable gets added to the > master branch I will happily test it out. Can you cook up a patch for it? > The one issue here is that I'm unsure that we would successfully learn > about problems with the change if only a very few people were using it. But we have to start somewhere. Stefan