From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Building Emacs overflowed pure space Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:07:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <7dbe73ed0607180138x35e9d9bft3e42f20cb369795c@mail.gmail.com> <200607181855.k6IItgAV027751@jane.dms.auburn.edu> <54557.203.180.88.109.1153317135.squirrel@weber.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153321702 10280 80.91.229.2 (19 Jul 2006 15:08:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 15:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Luc Teirlinck , rms@gnu.org, ralphm@members.fsf.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , mathias.dahl@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 19 17:08:17 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3Dea-0002Hx-9u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:08:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3DeZ-0007FU-RP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:07:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G3DeM-0007E0-KJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:07:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G3DeK-00079e-Q6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:07:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3DeK-00079T-FU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:07:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.184] (helo=tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G3Dgv-0000tg-FJ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:10:25 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([70.53.192.251]) by tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060719150709.RESM10262.tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net@localhost>; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:07:09 -0400 Original-Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D90E590A6; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:07:16 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp In-Reply-To: <54557.203.180.88.109.1153317135.squirrel@weber.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> (mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp's message of "Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:52:15 +0900 (JST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57342 Archived-At: > Does it make sense to allocate Lisp objects (with alignment) > forward from the beginning and non-Lisp objects (without > alignment) backward from the end in the pure storage? If the > following patch correct, pure-bytes-used decreases by ~70KB. Yes, I believe it makes perfect sense. Stefan