From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] (Or "question"...) isearch-kill-found Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:03:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87vda59rby.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87vda45euq.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <7F4A9988213544AEA1478E941C7E2109@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275420059 32361 80.91.229.12 (1 Jun 2010 19:20:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 19:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , Chong Yidong , Emacs-Devel devel , Drew Adams , Deniz Dogan To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 01 21:20:57 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJX1E-00060w-WF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 21:20:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58909 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OJX1D-0001TK-Lv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:20:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39832 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OJWk2-0003la-Fi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:03:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJWk1-0003NJ-4E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:03:10 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:50139) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJWk1-0003NA-0I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:03:09 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o51J33tR032518; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 15:03:03 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E1BFF705E4; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 15:03:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Tue, 1 Jun 2010 15:55:34 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3547=0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125431 Archived-At: >>>> > Why is not having a key to toggle the variable better? >>>> Because keys are in very short supply. >>> Not really, for a keymap such as isearch. >> Huh? =A0Please suggest free key-bindings, then. =A0Since keys not bound = in >> isearch-mode-map lead to exiting isearch and running the corresponding >> command in the global map, isearch-mode-map is basically just as full as >> the global map. > I made another suggestion, reuse C-M-h. > It will not interfere with the global command in a bad manner I > believe. You just have to do it twice in case you want the global > binding. I believe it will be easy getting used to it - as long as the > region is visible... Your choice of C-M-h, which has no particular mnemonic or logical connection to the functionality you suggest, together with the argumentation about how its impact would be bearable, is a vivid proof of my argument: keys are in very short supply. Stefan