From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-d deleting region considered harmful Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 18:04:12 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87eicrx1ls.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <83lj6zz9o0.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284826268 29844 80.91.229.12 (18 Sep 2010 16:11:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 16:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Eli Zaretskii' , emacs-devel@gnu.org, 'Miles Bader' To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 18 18:11:06 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ox00E-00064F-17 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 18:11:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57470 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ox009-00027n-Fi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:10:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45503 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Owztn-00076v-6L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:04:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Owzti-0001QV-Sr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:04:19 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:38503) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Owzth-0001QA-Fs; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:04:17 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (vpn-132-204-232-141.acd.umontreal.ca [132.204.232.141]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o8IG4DCZ027057; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:04:14 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 78BE96623B; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 18:04:12 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 18 Sep 2010 08:05:20 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3625=0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130424 Archived-At: > No. Both and C-d, whether mapped together or not, should do > what they have always done in Emacs: delete the next char. Whether the > region is active or not. Thanks. But we're discussing here what to do with C-d: for `delete' we already decided that it should delete an active region (by default). Whether you agree with this `delete' behavior is irrelevant. Stefan