From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "make autoloads" asks a question Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:01:33 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83pqqnu2hu.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298343707 5646 80.91.229.12 (22 Feb 2011 03:01:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 03:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 22 04:01:43 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PriVT-0007BM-HJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 04:01:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37181 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PriVS-0003TM-W0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:01:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60785 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PriVN-0003TG-UT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:01:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PriVN-00047y-48 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:01:37 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:59004 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PriVL-00047N-Kz; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:01:35 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEALu1Yk1FxIfm/2dsb2JhbACmQXS7N4VeBIUNj1E X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,204,1297054800"; d="scan'208";a="93020092" Original-Received: from 69-196-135-230.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.135.230]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 21 Feb 2011 22:01:34 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0877E58E26; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:01:33 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:15:26 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136365 Archived-At: >> Should batch-update-autoloads bind version-control to `never', to >> avoid this? > I think so. It only changes sections of the file that are > auto-generated, so there is no need to keep the previous version. > Stand-alone loaddefs files have version-control: never cookies. Sounds right, Stefan