From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `send-mail-function' default change Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:24:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310074625 13563 80.91.229.12 (7 Jul 2011 21:37:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 21:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 07 23:37:01 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QewFj-0008DL-Tq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 23:36:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42885 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QewFi-0002zE-P6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:36:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52221) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qew3N-0007ia-2E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:24:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qew3L-0005ML-DJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:24:08 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:50980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qew3I-0005L5-BR; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:24:04 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p67LO2mv011065; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 17:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5DEF1B4177; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 17:24:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 07 Jul 2011 22:56:11 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV3911=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9286 : core <3911> : streams <658567> : uri <909090> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141755 Archived-At: > But I have a suspicion that most people would like to get an error > message as early as possible. That's part of the choice between smtpmail and sendmail. So it's not related to the change of defaults, except that it makes this choice more explicit. Stefan