From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Are ELPA files "part of GNU Emacs"? Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:29:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87liled17y.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335745784 8686 80.91.229.3 (30 Apr 2012 00:29:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:29:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Bastien Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 30 02:29:43 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SOeUp-0000pa-4w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 02:29:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59086 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOeUo-0000GZ-HS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:29:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58077) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOeUl-0000GI-3E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:29:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOeUj-0004lf-D4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:29:38 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.143.162]:61658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOeUd-0004jb-NB; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:29:31 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApYIACxOgk9MCpLK/2dsb2JhbABDuCMDgQyBCIIJAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBwFtjKLYYR5BKRFgV2DAw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,391,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="177703262" Original-Received: from 76-10-146-202.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.146.202]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 29 Apr 2012 20:29:29 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3F3DF59097; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:29:29 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87liled17y.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Sun, 29 Apr 2012 17:09:05 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.143.162 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150146 Archived-At: > I see some ELPA files say they are part of GNU Emacs, some say they > are not part of GNU Emacs, some say they are part of another package > (e.g. auctex/tex.el is part of AUCTeX) -- and the rest say nothing. > I suggest they all say they are part of GNU ELPA, except for files > in packages like AUCTeX. I think they should not say they're part of Emacs, nor should they say they're not part of Emacs (they're kind of halfway, in my mind). Other than that, if they feel like saying they're part of something (ELPA, AUCTeX, you name it...), more power to them, Stefan