From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11606: 24.1; Get rid of buffer local hook variables in find-file.el Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 23:18:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1338693564 15296 80.91.229.3 (3 Jun 2012 03:19:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 03:19:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11606@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 03 05:19:23 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb1Le-0005bH-7i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 05:19:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51954 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb1Ld-0005By-Mj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 23:19:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47139) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb1La-0005BV-M2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 23:19:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb1LX-0000JG-PS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 23:19:18 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45603) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb1LX-0000Id-LK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 23:19:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb1NG-0007V1-Ax for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 23:21:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 03:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11606 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11606-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11606.133869361328768 (code B ref 11606); Sun, 03 Jun 2012 03:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11606) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2012 03:20:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55148 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb1MS-0007Tw-Qs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 23:20:13 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:56846) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb1MQ-0007Th-VY for 11606@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 23:20:11 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09sr+UI/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBwFugmQRAOjM4FYgwU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="187344369" Original-Received: from 108-175-229-8.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([108.175.229.8]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 02 Jun 2012 23:18:16 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7B48F59607; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 23:18:15 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Sun, 03 Jun 2012 10:07:28 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:60650 Archived-At: >> I like removing things, but could you expand on why you think we should >> remove these? > Not removing the hooks themselves but the buffer-local bits, i.e. I also like removing those, but I still don't know why you think these can be removed safely. Stefan