From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: package.el changes before the feature freeze Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 21:21:46 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1349054511 22930 80.91.229.3 (1 Oct 2012 01:21:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 01:21:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Hackney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 01 03:21:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TIUho-0000Z2-4L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 03:21:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49771 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIUhi-000853-It for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 21:21:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54608) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIUhg-00084y-F3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 21:21:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIUhf-0007DT-Dc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 21:21:48 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:45271) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIUhf-0007DN-9I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 21:21:47 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09FxLT4/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgcBboJkEQDozOBWIMF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="200338180" Original-Received: from 69-196-180-248.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([69.196.180.248]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 30 Sep 2012 21:21:46 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4DEB6AE5F6; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 21:21:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Daniel Hackney's message of "Sun, 30 Sep 2012 19:50:16 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153792 Archived-At: > I can make the cl => cl-lib conversion and patchify the result. Is it > okay to submit a patch whose stability I cannot guarantee? Of course, especially since I thnk people will first want to look at the patch anyway. > I'd hate to ruin someone's day if they are relying on the dev branch > for day-to-day work. Breakage on the trunk happens. That's why we have releases. Stefan