From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r111061: Fix for bad test in ruby-mode-tests.el. Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:07:21 -0500 Message-ID: References: <878v9groov.fsf@yandex.ru> <87ehj7hiy7.fsf@gnu.org> <50BCF33B.4080809@yandex.ru> <85vccitddw.fsf@member.fsf.org> <50BE3903.8000507@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354644460 7459 80.91.229.3 (4 Dec 2012 18:07:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 18:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen Leake , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 04 19:07:51 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TfwuI-00012V-CL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 19:07:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48484 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfwu6-0001rE-Dc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:07:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40169) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfwu1-0001r0-7j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:07:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfwtv-00015a-Cg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:07:29 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:51646) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfwtv-000152-8v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:07:23 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09soXOY/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSIHAW6CZBEA4hCmnGBWIMH X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="209066144" Original-Received: from 108-161-115-152.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([108.161.115.152]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 04 Dec 2012 13:07:22 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id EA04958C73; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 13:07:21 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <50BE3903.8000507@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 04 Dec 2012 18:55:15 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155255 Archived-At: >> And the policy is: don't modify TABs or spaces on lines you do >> not otherwise change. > Easier said than done when you are used to invoke `indent-sexp' on the > sexp enclosing a small change. AFAIK indent-sexp won't touch a line that's already properly indented, so TABs will only be changed to spaces (or vice versa) if you do fix the indentation, which is OK. Stefan