From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-i and TAB Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:44:30 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87mwvgp2t3.fsf@kanis.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360255486 6429 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2013 16:44:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:44:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Development List To: Ivan Kanis Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 07 17:45:05 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U3Uam-0002Xi-Hl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:44:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35859 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3UaT-0006JU-Nw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:44:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55128) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3UaP-0006If-5f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:44:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3UaO-0000Oq-34 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:44:32 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:41645) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3UaN-0000Oe-VD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:44:32 -0500 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r17GiUx5001906; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 11:44:30 -0500 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 99A20B4030; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 11:44:30 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87mwvgp2t3.fsf@kanis.fr> (Ivan Kanis's message of "Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:21:44 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4485=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4485> : streams <902226> : uri <1339301> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156861 Archived-At: > How come Emacs for X can't distinguish between C-i and TAB? I understand > why that happens on a terminal, but on X it should be possible... Emacs definitely distinguished between the two. But it has a function-key-map entry that turns `tab' (the event generated by your TAB key) into a C-i when there's no binding for `tab'. Stefan