From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Loading dynamic docstrings and bytecode more lazily Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 21:02:29 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360461976 24774 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2013 02:06:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 02:06:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 10 03:06:38 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U4MJR-0000MP-Mr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 03:06:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34960 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4MJ8-0007V0-Ce for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 21:06:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42843) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4MJ6-0007Uv-Nc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 21:06:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4MFT-0003ui-6n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 21:02:38 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:31904) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4MFT-0003uc-1V; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 21:02:31 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFpZnt/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjEAsOJhIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFpZnt/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjEAsOJhIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="888944" Original-Received: from 69-165-153-237.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.153.237]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 09 Feb 2013 21:02:29 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id BB7A85919F; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 21:02:29 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sat, 09 Feb 2013 15:09:32 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156935 Archived-At: >> Sadly, the result is disappointing. When loading cl-macs.elc (i.e. one >> the files where the change should shine), I see a speed up of 4%. > On a semi-related note, is it worth keeping byte-compile-dynamic? FWIW, my tests indicate that byte-compile-dynamic speeds up loading cl-macs.elc by a factor of 2. OTOH it makes no difference on cl-lib.elc so it should not be used for cl-lib.el. Stefan