From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r117000: Untabify cl-macs.el Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:27:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5354663D.3050107@dancol.org> <837g6jduo5.fsf@gnu.org> <5354C519.9090005@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1398115675 9823 80.91.229.3 (21 Apr 2014 21:27:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 21:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Daniel Colascione , emacs-devel To: Josh Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 21 23:27:47 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WcLke-0004VM-3l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 23:27:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51653 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WcLkd-0003Dh-NI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:27:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57046) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WcLkT-0003CP-As for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:27:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WcLkL-0007Qb-Rq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:27:33 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:53205) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WcLkL-0007QO-Mb; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:27:25 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s3LLRJt6011078; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:27:20 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C3BFF600CA; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:27:19 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (josh@foxtail.org's message of "Mon, 21 Apr 2014 11:17:15 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: * X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 1 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered ZERO_OBF_STOCK=1, RV4919=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9378 : core <4919> : inlines <751> : streams <1164204> : uri <1736689> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:171546 Archived-At: > Still, it would be nice to find a way to avoid the > battle Eli mentioned so people could C-x h C-M-\ with less risk that It's perfectly fine to change TAB-vs-SPC (in either direction) on a line that changes for some other reason anyway. So as long as C-M-\ only changes lines where the indentation is modified, there's no problem. Stefan PS: But note that C-M-\ will give "wrong" indentation in many Elisp files, sadly (typically because of lines that start with a single ";" in column 0), so better not use C-x h C-M-\ either. Basically, only touch the code that you touch.