From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16567: 24.3.50; pcase should signal an error if no case matches Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:17:31 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1410355122 11419 80.91.229.3 (10 Sep 2014 13:18:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:18:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16567@debbugs.gnu.org, Helmut Eller To: Leo Liu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 10 15:18:34 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XRhmy-0002A8-NI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:18:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56349 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRhmy-0007tA-38 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:18:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42582) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRhmn-0007qu-Ep for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:18:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRhmc-0007lN-Pv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:18:13 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44509) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRhmc-0007lC-Mz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XRhmc-00014v-5i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16567 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16567-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16567.14103550564109 (code B ref 16567); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16567) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2014 13:17:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36073 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XRhmB-00014D-Hp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:17:35 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:51057) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XRhm9-000144-BG for 16567@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:17:33 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s8ADHVOn022249; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:17:31 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 422E560608; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:17:31 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:52:18 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5059=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9378 : core <5059> : inlines <1275> : streams <1286131> : uri <1812249> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:93233 Archived-At: > Would `pcasex' be acceptable? It's kind of ugly, and I'm not sure what the "x" stands for. > I used xcase because I cannot come up with a good enough short name, > and a long name for such a fundamental macro can be annoying. `pcase-e TAB' should expand to `pcase-exhaustive', so the length is not that troublesome, unless you're concerned about line-length and indentation (in which case the length of `pcase-exhaustive' may indeed occasionally force you to use an extra line). I'm open to other suggestions, and `pcasex' is not unacceptable, so I think we're closing in. Stefan