From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18579: 24.3.93; vc-bzr-after-dir-status should not skip ignored files Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:38:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86vbo7wfsc.fsf@yandex.ru> <5428C3ED.8020102@yandex.ru> <5429E275.9010705@yandex.ru> <5429FA6F.7090104@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1412048373 27279 80.91.229.3 (30 Sep 2014 03:39:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 03:39:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18579@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 30 05:39:26 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XYoHc-0007qi-N9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 05:39:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40387 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XYoHc-0005II-CS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:39:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54311) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XYoHS-0005HS-OR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:39:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XYoHL-0007z5-8o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:39:14 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35914) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XYoHL-0007yf-5Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:39:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XYoHF-0002sR-PQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:39:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 03:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18579 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 18579-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18579.141204833811050 (code B ref 18579); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 03:39:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18579) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Sep 2014 03:38:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55711 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XYoHB-0002s8-8d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:38:57 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:50279) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XYoH8-0002rz-JO for 18579@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:38:55 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArYGAIDvNVNFxKjo/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSr0vgw6BFxd0giUBAQEBAgFWIxALDiYSFBgNJIgECNIZF456B4Q4BKkZgWqDTCE X-IPAS-Result: ArYGAIDvNVNFxKjo/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSr0vgw6BFxd0giUBAQEBAgFWIxALDiYSFBgNJIgECNIZF456B4Q4BKkZgWqDTCE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,753,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="91254777" Original-Received: from 69-196-168-232.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.168.232]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 29 Sep 2014 23:38:54 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id DB2D566094; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:38:53 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <5429FA6F.7090104@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Tue, 30 Sep 2014 04:33:51 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:93895 Archived-At: >>> Then, if we decide that the buffer should be listed as `ignored' after >>> `vc-ignore' call, the result of an edit by hand + `vc-dir-refresh' would be >>> different: the file will disappear from the list. >> That would be undesirable, indeed. I think that vc-dir-refresh should >> never remove entries: only vc-dir-hide-up-to-date should do that. > Then the file would still be listed as `unregistered', wouldn't it? That would be wrong: vc-dir-refresh shouldn't remove entries, but it should update them (i.e. turn the `unregistered' into `ignored' in this specific case). Stefan