From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bundling GNU ELPA packages Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:51:14 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87ioira4en.fsf@engster.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415371907 21357 80.91.229.3 (7 Nov 2014 14:51:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 14:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 07 15:51:40 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xmkt1-0001iW-Uq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 15:51:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60554 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xmkt1-0004Yb-BB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:51:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50190) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xmksq-0004Nu-80 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:51:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xmksf-0008Fn-A3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:51:28 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:42617) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xmksf-0008Fi-5w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:51:17 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Au4MAOatTlRLd+sd/2dsb2JhbABcgw6DYoZ+y1MEAgKBHBcBAXyEAwEBAwFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIhLCctyAQEBAQYBAQEBHpEIB4RLBYtkpjyBb4QWH4J6AQEB X-IPAS-Result: Au4MAOatTlRLd+sd/2dsb2JhbABcgw6DYoZ+y1MEAgKBHBcBAXyEAwEBAwFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIhLCctyAQEBAQYBAQEBHpEIB4RLBYtkpjyBb4QWH4J6AQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,797,1406606400"; d="scan'208";a="96201220" Original-Received: from 75-119-235-29.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.235.29]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 07 Nov 2014 09:51:14 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 73F6F8874; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 09:51:14 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87ioira4en.fsf@engster.org> (David Engster's message of "Fri, 07 Nov 2014 07:52:32 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:176525 Archived-At: > I second Lars' confusion here, and you didn't really answer his > question: if we "bundle a package from ELPA", it is *always* available, > isn't it? No, it's obviously not present after "git clone". Technically, we could *require* people to fetch the bundled elpa.git packages before proceeding with the build, but I think it's preferable if the bundled packages kept in elpa.git stay "loosely coupled". Stefan