From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-26: `with-eval-after-load' docstring omission Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 23:55:03 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1520571195 21825 195.159.176.226 (9 Mar 2018 04:53:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 04:53:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Emacs developers To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 09 05:53:11 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1euA1m-0005YP-CX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 05:53:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43247 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1euA3o-00088A-RT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 23:55:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34038) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1euA3i-00087k-0g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 23:55:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1euA3e-0004TY-4z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 23:55:10 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:37764) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1euA3d-0004SX-Vh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 23:55:06 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id w294t3b6021108; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 23:55:04 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id ABD3F60559; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 23:55:03 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Noam Postavsky's message of "Thu, 8 Mar 2018 20:00:40 -0500") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 3 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.1, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6238=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6238> : inlines <6474> : streams <1780859> : uri <2604779> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:223529 Archived-At: > Does it though (eval-after-load's docstring doesn't seem to)? Maybe we > should just say > Equivalent to (eval-after-load FILE (lambda () BODY)). I'd like to move towards eliminating uses of eval-after-load, so that doesn't sound too appealing. Stefan