From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Making 'eq' == 'eql' in bignum branch Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:47:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <09153aed-361d-4f82-d9ac-b502314769ae@cs.ucla.edu> <83lg91dqd4.fsf@gnu.org> <20180826201947.GC1867@ACM> <83in3w5yml.fsf@gnu.org> <834lff6ejd.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvnf4y7k.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1535384726 9786 195.159.176.226 (27 Aug 2018 15:45:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:45:26 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, pipcet@gmail.com, acm@muc.de, larsi@gnus.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 27 17:45:21 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fuJhh-0002Qn-82 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 17:45:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34012 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuJjn-0002HK-Jn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:47:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59623) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuJje-00028x-KB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:47:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuJjd-0005b2-Rh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:47:22 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:41959) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuJjW-0005PK-9U; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:47:15 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id w7RFl4CY025582; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:47:04 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0C2BE69F70; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:47:04 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83tvnf4y7k.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 27 Aug 2018 18:37:51 +0300") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6360=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6360> : inlines <6828> : streams <1796720> : uri <2697220> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228981 Archived-At: > How can you not pay for that? There might be a cost to supporting bignum buffer positions (even when only fixnum positions are being used), indeed. Like the case where bignums are used, I don't have a clear enough idea of whether it'll end up too costly or not. Stefan