From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Byte-compilation warning in eldoc.el Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:08:09 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83k0zbq2sd.fsf@gnu.org> <874kqfg7ju.fsf@gmail.com> <87v9ive69l.fsf@gmail.com> <87imevdos6.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10441"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?windows-1252?B?Sm/jbyBU4XZvcmE=?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 11 00:08:46 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ju1CH-0002f9-W7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 00:08:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56906 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ju1CG-0004BQ-Vb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:08:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ju1Bo-0003lW-4s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:08:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:46205) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ju1Bm-00080a-2D; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:08:15 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1C1F01012E2; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:08:12 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6A247101074; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:08:10 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1594418890; bh=8rlcaYB3+3HUNADbgHuYabDyiLi6QpbGD3S8Lq+/ruI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=FXXc6i8e9yQOTfkVCdX9xNiBjKTre4P9KwQDtTykcpQGMqXLCQs1wHDLdWRq6Xeru A6rcw5wGzhjN3HMnhe0KvAPjFT+4t49IYLovxSfnFKBr7Ruo+pqjYRzEGlGU7nbqK7 +bqY4EyxCmAMbjyRKopYwLunWsPzo84pcnmFsHuDPoDdz5tWyL3rba8fFNzk/Px0mD CQnkSBdkaQWp8tlSBuXTn/dy/kyc1oSk4b+4VHulmC+RcSInYCaCyTVWbqaUJOoUs+ fVR0EhXcy3MzolhOfGtt0+5rFPTEn65bDBK28TOTMyZRl1GcJ1IgLNHPIQYa0zA/yJ mtJbj1q+YLZ/g== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [157.52.23.7]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E63B812063B; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:08:09 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87imevdos6.fsf@gmail.com> (=?windows-1252?Q?=22Jo=E3o_T=E1vo?= =?windows-1252?Q?ra=22's?= message of "Fri, 10 Jul 2020 22:48:57 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/10 17:29:13 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252845 Archived-At: >> This is not a really bug in package.el but arguably a missing feature, >> indeed. When `package-activate-all` is called, it should probably >> reload all packages that were already loaded before (when the version >> already loaded is different from the one that's just been activated). > Sounds reasoable. But can these changes ever reach Emacs 26.3? Probably not, no, but in a few years nobody will care. The important thing is to fix it in `master` so that in a few years the problem is solved. Stefan