From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Modernize frame-title-format: "%b - GNU Emacs" Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:17:31 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20200827150417.GA6486@tuxteam.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13549"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 27 17:18:13 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kBJfJ-0003Rj-6D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 17:18:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34218 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBJfI-0001uF-7Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:18:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49366) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBJek-0001Ti-LW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:17:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:60814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBJei-0004O3-BD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:17:37 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DB19680668; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:17:34 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6DEAE80438; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:17:33 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1598541453; bh=xW0SMoypJQFgelK4oSqbiEjd0Pf+/Dij1SM0j8kZ6Jc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=aQx8e9qBnDEGNn05I0cYKedkrEMkVhAqE6QurqgH7QHzsGLYUSFw8ElpdeXaASouI lFuQuH2+XfadP303ysd3cq57iX1VduGWE9GFFCwLgHqNPU9j0JckI3kPIn0KTRK+OJ AQB9B0pwLck+mMhGRXxvUkBr+gF6Mz2U9PYZyknWoMEpqERZ1kEvSvGomHswYyCJ6b Fael2Y3L86LEuo9Ep/tvK99JsMT1SaohvdULCLkAtlMGikX4KPGPeb7pzXMZdvdZCN 5sDpKWGIEqyGGZrYQlRWQ8lbs8UOH1sqLZR125wXrvHRqkN072g5fx2pJNohvPlZjY PGMTixhjOhHag== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.246.108]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4760012077F; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:17:33 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20200827150417.GA6486@tuxteam.de> (tomas@tuxteam.de's message of "Thu, 27 Aug 2020 17:04:17 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/27 10:53:08 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:254301 Archived-At: >> And xterm adds a `*** ` in front of its title when output arrived but >> the window is iconified (maybe it's a feature I had to enable, can't >> remember, but at least the feature exists and uses a `*** ` prefix). > > This sounds a bit like the zIconBeep resource (start option -ziconbeep). Could be. > Does it beep also when output arrives? I wouldn't know, because I've been pretty careful to make sure you computers are generally as silent as possible (tho they're not all fanless yet, sadly). Stefan