From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...] Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:15:35 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87wnv7spji.fsf@gnus.org> <875z2rslqk.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1lfr647.fsf@gnus.org> <87pn0zfs4u.fsf@telefonica.net> <83mtw27l21.fsf@gnu.org> <2943d7ae-84fd-7762-609e-9e4afcbf4c8d@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19600"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: =?windows-1252?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 17 17:16:55 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lCPVX-0004zf-Iy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 17:16:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36324 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCPVW-0007OZ-KC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:16:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55224) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCPUK-0006ki-N7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:15:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:31698) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCPUI-0001RA-UM; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:15:40 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 93E334408E4; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:15:37 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B18F44412C6; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:15:35 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1613578535; bh=Jal4tVZfZB3QqkMEbOVG26fjlvJ3WLVaV094NKRy6B4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=f3cYA4yjhQiCN5+NfomfkeumyXwAwhPROEnWlgzVJGHQ7OKAZHEtSEuJwOaAOG2wf 8Q7Cxs60qMRH2hv/e9HExLknAR7C812dZZpraeeIBT2vC5i14+tjvi3FQSEH4oEPjS uiZ8DVvUwq4AvsTk4/HsHWsFrMfQve/BTdbqF81ib0EJhuUOVGz7YuUr66VzVb4nRH MSp9Axwx3Fuh5FREnlTMFaVRwmtl8cRx2aXD8ZugR/RPTfCrOdzaef1YpL0MVxhioq 551Ez2QrNwsuj+tgmcqqhMr0OdCkFn/AXifYijizvE25Y3i9+czZs/OjBWBecTlBIh LztZAawabXZOg== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.41.47]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6BDA120327; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:15:35 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <2943d7ae-84fd-7762-609e-9e4afcbf4c8d@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Wed, 17 Feb 2021 17:59:26 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265014 Archived-At: > What if we remove them from the list of completions, but still allow them= if > the user typed one out explicitly and pressed RET? Yes, clearly, we should allow executing those commands via M-x, we only want to avoid having those drown the other completions. A second step would be to still list them (maybe with an annotation like "?" or "=E2=81=88") if the list of completions would otherwise be empty. Stefan