From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] externals/denote 9f692cbbef: Revert "Make 'denote-{title, signature}-prompt' complete from its history" Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:04:11 -0400 Message-ID: References: <169825307506.11873.2953281488302419157@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20231025165755.64291C09BE7@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87zg041vy8.fsf@protesilaos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13210"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Protesilaos Stavrou Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 27 15:05:23 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qwMWg-00034N-N6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 15:05:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qwMVx-0007Ic-9R; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:04:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qwMVe-00079W-5R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:04:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qwMVa-0005wl-Te for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:04:17 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8F22210013E; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:04:13 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1698411852; bh=SeF15/WyFPJ0+C0rMlT6Q89gllAQ6TejP2T+La+/JZ0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=IN98C0PPAUoga27a2N15aTLS9fjnN2IT2ebGnhqJdc5ENp1zVOtIDcNI/cpXwEPWu C84SIX8gJTBN7TtHECiOK8vLC4I94HMfOQ8wowh+c6LVd8CJ6lnuV3NOw9GUNHU2HX Ur2IsLFeKfq8aUS0QK7WOwp6HbnZB3IDM7Xm6yChZXZmJlzq5mzzQeS4UOQOCkdoZ4 Gw8Ie300XdXeh2oa4Qn2uDg8XmSXOfnoP2Nq3MJiMBD7uQZID3oACLmBeCyHQKbYUw Fu2bNfzZT2YHg53+Chzoyy1w0HKBTUF+rH+aLsFIXkDatr45hFNXAmDcIv4Obps8QF WhvgbyiHEkTEQ== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BDB4B10006B; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:04:12 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.195.71]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 972BC12034B; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:04:12 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87zg041vy8.fsf@protesilaos.com> (Protesilaos Stavrou's message of "Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:22:07 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:311933 Archived-At: >> We've had discussions around this in the past but no resolution yet. >> Another bug report requesting an easier way to do that may help. > What do you think is the solution here? Not completely sure, but probably some way to tell `completing-read` that spaces are common in the set of completions, so the UI knows not to bind SPC to a completion command. Stefan