From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: function-key-map Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:58:40 -0400 Message-ID: References: <18189.42302.211705.594331@gargle.gargle.HOWL> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1192388348 5514 80.91.229.12 (14 Oct 2007 18:59:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:59:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 14 20:58:59 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ih8fy-0000Bp-Ba for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:58:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ih8fr-0000dt-QL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:58:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ih8fn-0000do-U4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:58:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ih8fm-0000dc-GO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:58:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ih8fm-0000dZ-BC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:58:46 -0400 Original-Received: from tomts5.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.25] helo=tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ih8fh-0000M5-Sg; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:58:42 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([70.55.141.81]) by tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20071014185840.JEOQ17217.tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net@pastel.home>; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:58:40 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5AB9A7F80; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:58:40 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat\, 13 Oct 2007 10\:14\:35 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:80859 Archived-At: > Sounds OK to me. Should I rename input-decode-map to key-decode-map > as well? I used `input' rather than `key' since it also applies to other > events (mouse events, etc...), but it probably makes more sense to > stay consistent. > Maybe it is better to move to names without `key'. > It is redundant, in this context. So maybe `fallback-alias-map'? I'm not sure about that: I think it's important to keep some distinguishing word in there to say that these are maps from keys to keys rather than from keys to commands. `key' used to be the magic word to indicate this fact. Stefan