From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Next release Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 15:05:31 -0400 Message-ID: References: <18457.37369.262079.668907@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <5jr6clncn8.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87od7p22dw.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <200805021331.m42DVYVw016584@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200805021610.m42GAhkE001271@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1209841581 12263 80.91.229.10 (3 May 2008 19:06:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 19:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Glenn Morris , Chong Yidong , Dan Nicolaescu , Nick Roberts , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 03 21:26:44 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JsNNU-0001Cf-Ev for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 May 2008 21:26:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52816 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JsN3a-0004Ow-L8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 May 2008 15:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JsN3V-0004Or-Tp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 May 2008 15:05:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JsN3Q-0004Oc-AF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 May 2008 15:05:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35757 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JsN3Q-0004OZ-5f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 May 2008 15:05:52 -0400 Original-Received: from 206-248-152-33.dsl.teksavvy.com ([206.248.152.33] helo=ceviche.home) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JsN3O-0000rT-W6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 May 2008 15:05:51 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7D0BD70049; Sat, 3 May 2008 15:05:31 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu's message of "Sat, 03 May 2008 18:38:39 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:96383 Archived-At: > 22.0.90 and 22.2. As the Carbon port is likely to become Emacs 22 > only, such progress has no appropriate destination other than > EMACS_22_BASE. How much work would be needed to make the Carbon code on the trunk work well? IIUC it only suffers from 1 problem which is the timely handling of input. It looks like a fairly small problem: maybe not easy to fix, but if someone who knows the code were to take it seriously, it should not require much work. That would be very welcome and we could then keep the Carbon port (probably complemented by your AppKit changes) for Emacs-23. Stefan