From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5365: 23.1.91; Wrong type argument: keymapp, ("DEAD" . 35215396) Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:21:00 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87skab2ww3.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <87ockyqq2c.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <87aawigcam.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87pr5d7w4m.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87pr5d9163.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263444582 1000 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2010 04:49:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 04:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Sven Joachim , 5365@debbugs.gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 14 05:49:34 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NVHeH-0003XF-2Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:49:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40894 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVHeH-0005e7-S7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:49:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVHe4-0005aE-Ui for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:49:20 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVHe0-0005Ys-6n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:49:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60340 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVHe0-0005Yl-3X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:49:16 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39983) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVHdz-00071F-RE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:49:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NVHDe-0007dH-C3; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:22:02 -0500 X-Loop: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 04:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 5365 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5365-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5365.126344286829310 (code B ref 5365); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 04:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5365) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jan 2010 04:21:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NVHCl-0007ch-Ja for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:21:07 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NVHCj-0007cH-3f for 5365@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:21:05 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: At4EAPIqTktFxLLV/2dsb2JhbACBRdZIhDAEijM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,272,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="53720051" Original-Received: from 69-196-178-213.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.178.213]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 13 Jan 2010 23:21:01 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 99933806E; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:21:00 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87pr5d9163.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:53:40 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:22:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:34313 Archived-At: >> Indeed, that looks risky. Why don't we add this new kboard to the >> all_kboards list before calling Qvendor_specific_keysyms? > We'd still have to protect the terminal object. Why? It's a normal Lisp object, so it should be protected by the usual GCPRO or stack marking, no? [ Oddly enough, mark_terminal doesn't traverse the terminal's kboard. ] As for my original question: can anyone think of a reason not to place the new kboard in all_kboards earlier? Stefan