From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ja-dic.el and SKK-JYSYO.L Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:11:32 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1266387113 18655 80.91.229.12 (17 Feb 2010 06:11:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:11:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: expire-by-2010-02-18@kanis.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 17 07:11:50 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nhd8W-0003Qw-MT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:11:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33310 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nhd8W-0002l1-0A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:11:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nhd8M-0002jy-L9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:11:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46301 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nhd8K-0002jq-GS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:11:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nhd8H-0004ei-ST for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:11:36 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:3759 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nhd8H-0004ea-Pl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:11:33 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAEMXe0vO+LpH/2dsb2JhbACaf3W9aYRbBIMUh14 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,488,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="56175070" Original-Received: from 206-248-186-71.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([206.248.186.71]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2010 01:11:32 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 68515B40F8; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:11:32 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Kenichi Handa's message of "Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:29:54 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121159 Archived-At: >>>> If we do that, we need to replace the file by a URL in the tarball (so >>>> the file in `admin' is just a cache). >> > ?? I don't understand exactly what you mean. >> It's because I was vague: the precise way we replace the file by a URL >> is left unspecified. > How about including .bzr directory (or something) so that a > user who extracted files from the tarball can get all files > just by typing "bzr up" under admin/*? Is such a thing > possible by bzr? It'd have to be "bzr revert" rather than "bzr update" since missing files are considered as implicit "bzr rm" requests. I'd rather have a plain file giving URLs (and md5sums) so people who want to get the source will know where to find it. Stefan "As mentioned, I'd even prefer to just keep all those files in the tarball"