Re: killing an indirect buffer

Re: killing an indirect buffer

[Stefan Monnier]

> But I do want the base-buffer killed when a user kills the indirect buffer
> in my specific application. Can anyone think of a way to have the
> base-buffer killed when an indirect buffer is killed?  I first thought of
> something like the following hook, made buffer-local in my indirect buffer:

>   (add-hook 'kill-buffer-hook 'my-kill-buffer-hook-fun)

>   (defun my-kill-buffer-hook-fun ()
>      (kill-buffer (buffer-base-buffer)))

You can try:

  (defun my-kill-buffer-hook-fun ()
    (let ((kill-buffer-hook nil))
     (kill-buffer (buffer-base-buffer))))

You'll also want to try and make sure that your my-kill-buffer-hook-fun
is run last in kill-buffer-hook.


        Stefan

killing an indirect buffer

[Erik Iverson]

I am working with indirect buffers. According to the GNU Emacs manual,

"Killing the base buffer effectively kills the indirect buffer, but 
killing an indirect buffer has no effect on its base buffer."

But I do want the base-buffer killed when a user kills the indirect 
buffer in my specific application. Can anyone think of a way to have the 
base-buffer killed when an indirect buffer is killed?  I first thought 
of something like the following hook, made buffer-local in my indirect 
buffer:

   (add-hook 'kill-buffer-hook 'my-kill-buffer-hook-fun)

   (defun my-kill-buffer-hook-fun ()
      (kill-buffer (buffer-base-buffer)))

but then killing the indirect buffer will attempt to kill the 
base-buffer which will attempt to kill the indirect buffer, which will 
attempt ...


and I get "not: Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'"


Thanks!
Erik Iverson