From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Wrestling Match: lisp.h vs rest of the includes Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:51:14 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281539291 13846 80.91.229.12 (11 Aug 2010 15:08:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 11 17:08:07 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjCuU-0006rL-FF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:08:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40173 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OjCuU-0006d2-0S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:08:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59381 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OjCuL-0006ZY-Pr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:08:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjCty-00009L-3C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:07:57 -0400 Original-Received: from impaqm4.telefonica.net ([213.4.138.4]:62538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjCtx-00008m-Rg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:07:34 -0400 Original-Received: from IMPmailhost4.adm.correo ([10.20.102.125]) by IMPaqm4.telefonica.net with bizsmtp id sw1e1e00B2iL0W23Q37MMl; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:07:21 +0200 Original-Received: from ceviche.home ([83.40.4.203]) by IMPmailhost4.adm.correo with BIZ IMP id t37L1e0044NokFF1k37L7H; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:07:21 +0200 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-TE-authinfo: authemail="monnier$movistar.es" |auth_email="monnier@movistar.es" X-TE-AcuTerraCos: auth_cuTerraCos="cosuitnetc01" Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4FC3D660F0; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:07:20 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:46:58 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128563 Archived-At: >> Why did you choose to keep the lisp.h version rather than the other? > I haven't seen (or haven't noticed) any tendency towards moving things > out of lisp.h. Otherwise I wouldn't have asked. Indeed, we haven't made a strong attempt at doing it, but it was decided a long time ago that we wanted to do that (a bit before I made a bunch of changes to keymap.c where I took the opportunity to create a keymap.h and move some of the declarations from lisp.h to this new file, i.e. late 2001 accoding to "bzr log"). Stefan