From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Sync docs between X, W32, NS Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:29:46 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83aalx713c.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288369885 26455 80.91.229.12 (29 Oct 2010 16:31:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 29 18:31:24 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PBrrP-00019w-6t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:31:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47145 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PBrrO-0008Hp-Hh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:31:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51930 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PBrpt-0007Q4-M7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:29:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PBrps-0000TS-KR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:29:49 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:7980 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PBrpr-0000RM-Mo; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:29:47 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgwKAO+SykzO+Krc/2dsb2JhbACgVn1yvyuFSASSKg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,260,1286164800"; d="scan'208";a="81046219" Original-Received: from 206-248-170-220.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([206.248.170.220]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 29 Oct 2010 12:29:46 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 85979660F5; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:29:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83aalx713c.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:19:35 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132173 Archived-At: > I wonder if it wouldn't be better to have only one implementation of I don't wonder. I know it to be the case (and have said so in this list a few times already). Stefan