From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10238: R in gnus-summary does not pop a frame like F does Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:47:12 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325800059 27752 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2012 21:47:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 21:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10238@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 05 22:47:35 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Riv9r-0001iQ-9Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:47:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39384 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Riv9q-00061T-VF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:47:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Riv9n-00061D-Ov for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:47:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Riv9m-0002m3-Mq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:47:31 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38334) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Riv9m-0002lz-Jw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:47:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RivDB-0005xG-SI; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:51:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10238 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10238-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10238.132580024822871 (code B ref 10238); Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10238) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2012 21:50:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RivCy-0005wq-1y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:50:48 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RivCw-0005wj-Kw for 10238@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:50:47 -0500 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q05LlDeE013271; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:47:13 -0500 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4A188B4459; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:47:13 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 05 Jan 2012 06:01:04 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4092=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4092> : streams <717071> : uri <1041340> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:51:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:55409 Archived-At: >> I'm not completely sure ("emacs -Q" doesn't work too well with Gnus ;-), >> but something like (setq special-display-regexps '("^\\*.*\\*$")) might >> be sufficient. > Yes, that allows me to reproduce the bug. > I seem to recall the change here being made because a user had reported > that `special-display-regexps' was being respected, and that the Gnus > window conf wasn't. So just backing out the patch doesn't seem like the > right thing to do, either... > (But of course, `F' and `R' should behave the same way here, anyway...) > Is there a way to have > (setq special-display-regexps '("^\\*.*\\*$")) > but still say "don't do this for the Message buffers? With special-display-regexps, I think something like the code below should do it: (setq special-display-regexps '(("^\\*unsent.*\\*$" switch-to-buffer) "^\\*.*\\*$")) > If so, the patch can be reverted, and the user who complained can just > twiddle the variable in question... Sounds good to me, Stefan