From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10463: 24.0.92; c-literal-limits out of range Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 09:02:04 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4F0ABDCF.7030400@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1326117793 7839 80.91.229.12 (9 Jan 2012 14:03:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:03:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10463@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 09 15:03:06 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RkFoV-0003ak-U9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:03:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36795 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkFoV-0004aR-Hl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 09:03:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52967) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkFoN-0004Zn-Jj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 09:03:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkFoG-0005w9-OP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 09:02:55 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56141) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkFoG-0005w2-Iu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 09:02:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RkFoU-0008LQ-5X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 09:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10463 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10463-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10463.132611774332025 (code B ref 10463); Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10463) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2012 14:02:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50814 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RkFnq-0008KU-OO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 09:02:22 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:52264) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RkFnp-0008KN-3d for 10463@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 09:02:21 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q09E25Fk032022; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 09:02:06 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4DD9958F7E; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 09:02:04 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4F0ABDCF.7030400@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:13:35 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4095=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4095> : streams <718151> : uri <1043561> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:55571 Archived-At: > Moreover, the buffer was no more associated with the file I was trying > to edit, so reverting the buffer was impossible, undo information had > been discarded, killing the buffer was possible without asking. That's presumably because the code uses something like with-silent-modifications. I.e. it's not a problem (contrary to the `args-out-of-range' error, obviously). Stefan