From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10783: Some built-in functionslost their argument names Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:01:53 -0500 Message-ID: References: <3tfwei753u.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <8339ah1yek.fsf@gnu.org> <8qzkcpj8oi.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83fwegzoka.fsf@gnu.org> <837gzsyq00.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1329066165 21552 80.91.229.3 (12 Feb 2012 17:02:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10783@debbugs.gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 12 18:02:44 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rwcoy-0001b0-LI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:02:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50208 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rwcoy-0004aM-8n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:02:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39861) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rwcov-0004Yf-N3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:02:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rwcou-0007dA-JQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:02:37 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34084) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rwcou-0007d6-Hs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:02:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RwcqH-0001Mo-MY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:04:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10783 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10783-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10783.13290662075180 (code B ref 10783); Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10783) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2012 17:03:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37707 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rwcpj-0001LV-4q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:03:27 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:39579 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rwcpg-0001LO-UZ for 10783@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:03:25 -0500 Original-Received: from dsl-67-204-2-91.acanac.net ([67.204.2.91]:61842 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RwcoG-0005de-EB; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:01:56 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5D2506620B; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:01:53 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <837gzsyq00.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:29:19 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56838 Archived-At: >> Just for the record: such duplicate definitions should be removed. >> E.g. the C and pc-win.el definitions should be refactored such that >> there is only one C definition (which might call an Elisp implementation >> in the MS-DOS case). > That would require extracting the common parts from the various > *select.c source files and putting them on a common file compiled into > all ports. Yup. > Not something for the current pretest, IMO. Yup. Stefan