From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bootstrap deleted DOC-nnn file Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 13:37:59 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83vc6rb31c.fsf@gnu.org> <83a9o2at0z.fsf@gnu.org> <834ne9brlz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1368293906 4916 80.91.229.3 (11 May 2013 17:38:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 17:38:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, yandros@MIT.EDU, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 11 19:38:26 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UbDkX-0006t9-T4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 19:38:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52460 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UbDkS-0001W0-Ud for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 13:38:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38645) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UbDkQ-0001Vv-MG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 13:38:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UbDkP-0005xG-Qs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 13:38:18 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:29757) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UbDkO-0005ta-H0; Sat, 11 May 2013 13:38:16 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFG4rwb8/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFG4rwb8/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="11807904" Original-Received: from 184-175-6-252.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([184.175.6.252]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 11 May 2013 13:38:10 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 40D9567A20; Sat, 11 May 2013 13:37:59 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat, 11 May 2013 12:49:54 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:159513 Archived-At: > I think it's simply time to give up on DOC-nn.mm and just use "DOC". > I'll do that later this week. > Won't that cause all but the latest Emacs executable in the directory > to fail to access doc strings? No, they'll just all use the same file, just like they all use the same .el and .elc files. Stefan