From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14773: 24.2; pcase Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 18:53:11 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87mwq3d1pp.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372892056 7095 80.91.229.3 (3 Jul 2013 22:54:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 22:54:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: John Williams , 14773@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 04 00:54:14 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UuVw9-0006hG-MS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:54:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57028 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UuVw9-0002Te-B0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 18:54:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41766) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UuVw4-0002TW-Vv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 18:54:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UuVw4-0000Ua-4B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 18:54:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33061) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UuVw4-0000Tj-0w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 18:54:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UuVw3-0003DH-04 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 18:54:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 22:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14773 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 14773-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14773.137289200212259 (code B ref 14773); Wed, 03 Jul 2013 22:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14773) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2013 22:53:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55610 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UuVvN-0003Bc-D7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 18:53:21 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:48230) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UuVvH-0003BJ-GH for 14773@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 18:53:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r63MrBpS011457; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 18:53:12 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3D9FFAE15B; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 18:53:11 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87mwq3d1pp.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Wed, 03 Jul 2013 18:53:38 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4628=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4628> : streams <993581> : uri <1466168> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:75866 Archived-At: > Why is it unreachable? Right, it's not, duh! It's clearly too aggressive, Stefan