From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15322: VC log buffer scrolls itself Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:24:28 -0400 Message-ID: References: <55fvtc5z7w.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <70six9g7nn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1382626161 18551 80.91.229.3 (24 Oct 2013 14:49:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Pogonyshev , 15322@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 24 16:49:23 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VZMDz-0000iP-38 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:49:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54746 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZMDy-0007Hf-O7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:49:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36564) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZMDn-0007Dp-I5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:49:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZMDf-0008Gx-JQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:49:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55441) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZMDf-0008GP-Fk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:49:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VZLqP-0008QS-PY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15322 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15322-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15322.138262467332346 (code B ref 15322); Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15322) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2013 14:24:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41179 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VZLpw-0008Pe-Eo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:24:32 -0400 Original-Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:38824) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VZLpt-0008PU-VN for 15322@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:24:30 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home ([24.201.53.56]) by VL-VM-MR006.ip.videotron.ca (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-22.01 64bit (built Apr 21 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MV600CKJG0TVD10@VL-VM-MR006.ip.videotron.ca> for 15322@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:24:29 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E64046609A; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:24:28 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:79588 Archived-At: > IMHO scrolling should only happen if point is still at BOB. FWIW, I agree with Paul that scrolling is just a bad idea here. It's good to do it when we specifically requested to see the log comment of a particular revision (e.g. we already have a log displayed and from vc-annotate we ask for the comment of some revision), but otherwise it's just a waste of effort that ends up annoying more often than not. Stefan