From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Redisplay problems? Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:33:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ppljg4ti.fsf@kanru-mozilla.corp.tpe1.mozilla.com> <5329C53B.3030008@gmx.at> <532ABA60.7000003@gmx.at> <83siqc7n87.fsf@gnu.org> <83a9ck6lzf.fsf@gnu.org> <83eh1v5y53.fsf@gnu.org> <83y5024r1w.fsf@gnu.org> <83ior6489a.fsf@gnu.org> <834n2q43os.fsf@gnu.org> <83vbv62gr7.fsf@gnu.org> <83txao1c8n.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395664435 17990 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2014 12:33:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, christian@defun.dk, cloos@jhcloos.com, kanru@kanru.info, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 24 13:34:03 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WS44o-0007Ys-Sn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:34:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36133 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS44o-0005Ai-3w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49364) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS44d-00053m-QO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:33:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS44W-0004KL-H6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:33:51 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:47093) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS44W-0004K6-Cc; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:33:44 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s2OCXUuH017109; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:33:30 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 67386600A2; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:33:30 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83txao1c8n.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 24 Mar 2014 05:55:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4891=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4891> : inlines <634> : streams <1143830> : uri <1708491> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170908 Archived-At: > I still don't see anything performance critical even in this scenario. I lived with the older slower behavior for many years, indeed. But computers aren't getting very much faster and avoiding a rebuild of the glyph matrices sped up some of my use cases significantly, making the behavior noticeably smoother. Stefan