From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r117002: Correctly treat progn contents as toplevel forms when byte compiling Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:20:12 -0400 Message-ID: References: <535558EA.7070506@dancol.org> <53559BD2.3000006@dancol.org> <5355D244.2050104@dancol.org> <5355F442.6080606@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1398180047 26440 80.91.229.3 (22 Apr 2014 15:20:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 22 17:20:40 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WccUv-0001st-Po for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:20:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55714 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WccUu-0007yG-St for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:20:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55756) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WccUi-0007gs-5Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:20:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WccUa-0000aW-GY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:20:24 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:40753) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WccUa-0000aO-Bz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:20:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s3MFKCFd002108; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:20:12 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3A70BAE159; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:20:12 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <5355F442.6080606@dancol.org> (Daniel Colascione's message of "Mon, 21 Apr 2014 21:46:58 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4920=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9378 : core <4920> : inlines <755> : streams <1164603> : uri <1737533> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:171578 Archived-At: > `(defun ,member-name (,inst-arg &rest xargs) > ,doc > (declare (advertised-calling-convention (,inst-arg ,@xarglist) > ,emacs-version)) > (apply (cl-struct-slot-value ',iface-name ',member-name ,inst-arg) > ,inst-arg xargs))))) I think we'd be just as happy, with something like (defun method-call (method inst &rest args) (apply (funcall method inst) inst args)) instead of defining umpteen "method call wrappers". Stefan