From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is `gnutls-negotiate' missing a `copy-sequence'? Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 12:17:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: <877g3x2ihr.fsf@fx.delysid.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1404231477 6645 80.91.229.3 (1 Jul 2014 16:17:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 16:17:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Mario Lang Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 01 18:17:50 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X20kg-0004xw-JW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 18:17:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48825 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X20kg-0005pL-0P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 12:17:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40818) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X20kV-0005p3-Lc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 12:17:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X20kO-0002ZA-5B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 12:17:39 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:14565) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X20kO-0002Yv-0C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 12:17:32 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArUGAIDvNVNLd+D9/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA9gRcXdIIlAQEBAQIBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiAQI0hkXjnoHhDgEqRmBaoNMIQ X-IPAS-Result: ArUGAIDvNVNLd+D9/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA9gRcXdIIlAQEBAQIBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiAQI0hkXjnoHhDgEqRmBaoNMIQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,753,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="71108664" Original-Received: from 75-119-224-253.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([75.119.224.253]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 01 Jul 2014 12:17:30 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4B5EE660FA; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 12:17:30 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <877g3x2ihr.fsf@fx.delysid.org> (Mario Lang's message of "Tue, 01 Jul 2014 17:42:24 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:172842 Archived-At: > Hmm, `gnutls-verify-error' is a defcustom, and `cl-mapcan' will > destructively modify it. Am I missing something, or should we add a > `copy-sequence' around the `cdr'? Sounds about right. The destructive nature of cl-mapcan sucks. Stefan