From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19206: 25.0.50; CC Mode tracks wrong source files Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:49:07 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1417204236 20453 80.91.229.3 (28 Nov 2014 19:50:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:50:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19206@debbugs.gnu.org To: Sebastian Wiesner Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 28 20:50:29 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XuRYi-0000G6-Qc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 20:50:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45695 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XuRYi-0002uT-GW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:50:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32814) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XuRYY-0002uH-8z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:50:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XuRYQ-000510-QK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:50:18 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51463) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XuRYI-0004hE-VR; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XuRYI-0003fk-BJ; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19206 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,cc-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19206-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19206.141720415414047 (code B ref 19206); Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19206) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2014 19:49:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48676 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XuRXV-0003eU-Mc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:49:14 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:41390) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XuRXR-0003eB-Rg for 19206@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:49:10 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id sASJn7o6027819; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:49:08 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 387883EB6; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:49:07 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Sebastian Wiesner's message of "Fri, 28 Nov 2014 11:19:01 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5139=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5139> : inlines <1569> : streams <1350042> : uri <1836510> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:96710 Archived-At: > I did not try to find the culprit. The CC Mode code is convoluted > beyond my understanding. Agreed, it's madness. I'd like to streamline it (at some runtime cost), but that requires major modes that use CC to do (require 'cc-langs) rather than (eval-when-compile (require 'cc-langs)) Still, you can already do that and I recommend it since it should reduce the number of ways the code can fail. More to the point, it might fix the problem you're experiencing (maybe cc-miscompile will still be mentioned in there, but it hopefully won't be any more). Stefan