From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master e82fd95: ; Comments. Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 23:32:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20150428064624.30702.5768@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1430278335 31328 80.91.229.3 (29 Apr 2015 03:32:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 03:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 29 05:32:08 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YnIjH-0004dP-Pl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 05:32:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36695 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnIjH-0005Nv-4G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 23:32:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46671) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnIjE-0005L2-0R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 23:32:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnIjA-0003zO-Pd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 23:32:03 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:44971) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnIjA-0003zK-Mc; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 23:32:00 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFAGvvdVS4rw4V/2dsb2JhbAA3gVOhb4EIgXUBAQQBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiBOiEYt4AwcVBwFFCQMDgz4Dg3AEo2OEWA X-IPAS-Result: AgUFAGvvdVS4rw4V/2dsb2JhbAA3gVOhb4EIgXUBAQQBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiBOiEYt4AwcVBwFFCQMDgz4Dg3AEo2OEWA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,557,1422939600"; d="scan'208";a="117738670" Original-Received: from 184-175-14-21.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([184.175.14.21]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 28 Apr 2015 23:32:00 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0C8194650; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 23:32:00 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:51:42 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:185996 Archived-At: > So anyone who just called 'rmail-edit-mode' would get unexpected results? I guess so. Not being an Rmail user at all, it's hard for me to judge what that means. Do we expect end-users to call rmail-edit-mode via M-x or via some external Elisp snippet? If so, maybe we could just add to rmail-edit-mode some appropriate check that the buffer-swapping was done as needed: it wouldn't make it work as before, but it might at least signal an error before it goes on to do something potentially dangerous? > But if you can find a way to make it work, please go for it! I'm 99.9% unfamiliar with Rmail, both as a user and as a programmer, so I'd prefer if someone else does it (e.g. someone who might actually know how to test the resulting code, for example). Stefan