From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 09:23:22 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8A8DA980-13A7-4F8B-9D07-391728C673C9@raeburn.org> <831su4dmn4.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9300x5n.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <734D2132-71FD-414D-B091-629189742DB4@raeburn.org> <83a8889ede.fsf@gnu.org> <144D5F87-D876-485D-BAB3-2AA93627272A@raeburn.org> <83inmq53xk.fsf@gnu.org> <96D35768-314C-43F5-BD5E-B12187759DCA@raeburn.org> <123104DD-447F-4CDB-B3A0-CED80E3AC8C9@raeburn.org> <20170403165736.GA2851@acm> <2497A2D5-FDB1-47FF-AED3-FD4ABE2FE144@raeburn.org> <83lgrhpalq.fsf@gnu.org> <0D99B4FE-FEEF-4565-87D6-E230A05DEF3C@raeburn.org> <86lgrc4vob.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <834ly0oew1.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1491571490 14306 195.159.176.226 (7 Apr 2017 13:24:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 13:24:50 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 07 15:24:46 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cwTsO-00022n-Kw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 15:24:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50859 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwTsU-0001eB-8T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 09:24:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36032) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwTri-0001dn-UP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 09:23:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwTrf-0000w5-PT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 09:23:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=51456 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwTrf-0000vV-IA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 09:23:47 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cwTrO-0004hV-SV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 15:23:30 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 7 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:Hu8TuHdUPSaM55lmyGqqD0yb9PA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213745 Archived-At: > Perhaps we could have a separate, much smaller dumped.elc for batch > invocations, to cater to these use cases. Ken, does this make sense? FWIW, I'm not sure if there is much to save there. Stefan