From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Fix" sag scaling for hidpi Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:19:00 -0500 Message-ID: References: <07D5E64D-DAD0-45B3-B272-627A73D7CBAE@gmail.com> <7308DB2C-27A5-4227-A1F9-9949EE558052@gmail.com> <87sg6alweo.fsf@gnus.org> <87pn1erewq.fsf@gmail.com> <87wnvlecrw.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg69o3av.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtwhctte.fsf@gnus.org> <459A0475-E3E7-4159-82DF-93809CCF1E24@gmail.com> <87eehng52n.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtwbye5b.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40180"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel , Eli Zaretskii , Yuan Fu , Alan Third To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 10 20:21:00 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l9v2q-000AJa-2c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 20:21:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40272 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9v2p-0005lE-55 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:20:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50266) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9v16-0004Kv-VC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:19:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:58084) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9v0z-0001Vq-IH; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:19:10 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BFF7F10025D; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:19:03 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 42B71100091; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:19:02 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1612984742; bh=xV4gEioFwKZhYjSAI8cJ1PxzqRwceRTI1a8F85hIp78=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=nJ/bsXIp9CNJBGUeUzm4FyAnPZH9R+KneE1S81ysyEBTEMBh8qUDDLt8bSJjpjErN Cjg+ctqWVP+xCR6fAeNZjwkxsE0TbI2bIRLzxzJMP0VTEaqb9vq4GYUtyGDeRAH0dV TcTLOM7O15gk8irU5kQaYauE8iffeyOYFKLiIgk/HjA2guZbs06n9uPtk/Z0QdvlLQ 6Clz6oWDCPiFRvrLkPseElX/sEVUbf0GBVhkAoi6bp0Q+s0tUVAdupldJSypXox7s0 q3L9yBF3Vw+Wl9WPNqWlOo/RVCfwcPwNumkzAFSP4Y49hubYlsVTpbBorOfYQ6EcbP Q2KwlYalGDhkQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.41.47]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0C261202F2; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:19:01 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87mtwbye5b.fsf@gmail.com> (Robert Pluim's message of "Wed, 10 Feb 2021 19:24:32 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264330 Archived-At: > Eli, Lars, when can we realistically envisage deprecating lucid > support? Followed a release later by the current gtk support. I suspect that the "current gtk" support will disappear before the Lucid support, since the Lucid support is still AFAIK the only one that supports having frames on multiple X servers. I also suspect that the "current gtk" support can disappear as soon as the "pgtk" port is marked non-experimental, hence soon, e.g. it could be gone for Emacs-29. Stefan